Triclosan antibacterial soap no better than plain soap to fight germs

Triclosan antibacterial soaps no better than plain soap to fight germsA research team from Korea University has determined that antibacterial soaps containing triclosan do not fight germs any better than plain soap.

In December, 2013, the FDA created a rule that soap manufacturers had to prove antibacterial soaps are more effective at fighting germs than regular soap.


Triclosan is an antimicrobial agent commonly found in antibacterial and antifungal products. It can be found in personal care products, toys, kitchenware and clothing to reduce or prevent contamination and growth of bacteria. Although triclosan has been proven to fight bacteria and germs, adverse effects have been documented through its use – allergies, endocrine disruptions and toxicity, to name a few.

For the study the research team compared two types of soap through in vitro and in-vivo experiments. The two soaps were exposed to 20 different bacterial strains and tested under conditions which replicated hand washing.

Both products contained the same ingredients with the exception of one containing 0.3 percent triclosan. Microbe exposure lasted for 20 seconds and water temperatures were 22 and 40 degrees Celsius which are recommended temperatures for soap.

In-vitro testing was conducted at 22 degrees Celsius, and in-vivo testing was completed at 40 degrees Celsius by volunteers. Volunteers washed their hands in accordance to guidelines set out by the World Health Organization – lather soap vigorously for 30 seconds, cover entire surface of hands and lower forearms and rinse.

Researchers found there was no immediate significant difference in bacterial activity between the plain soap and the antibacterial soap which contained triclosan. After nine hours the antibacterial soap did show greater bactericidal effects which suggest the antibacterial effects of triclosan do not occur during hand washing but appear much later.

Researchers have two reasons as to why the triclosan soap didn’t kill the bacteria more immediately or more effectively than plain soap:

1) Exposure was too short – 20 seconds is not long enough to fight germs.

2) The soaps contained detergents and surfactants which could reduce the effectiveness of triclosan.


The findings were published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.


Author Bio

Mohan Garikiparithi got his degree in medicine from Osmania University (University of Health Sciences). He practiced clinical medicine for over a decade before he shifted his focus to the field of health communications. During his active practice he served as the head of the Dept. of Microbiology in a diagnostic centre in India. On a three-year communications program in Germany, Mohan developed a keen interest in German Medicine (Homoeopathy), and other alternative systems of medicine. He now advocates treating different medical conditions without the use of traditional drugs. An ardent squash player, Mohan believes in the importance of fitness and wellness.