Triclosan antibacterial soap no better than plain soap to fight germs

Written by Mohan Garikiparithi
Published on

Triclosan antibacterial soaps no better than plain soap to fight germsA research team from Korea University has determined that antibacterial soaps containing triclosan do not fight germs any better than plain soap.

In December, 2013, the FDA created a rule that soap manufacturers had to prove antibacterial soaps are more effective at fighting germs than regular soap.

Triclosan is an antimicrobial agent commonly found in antibacterial and antifungal products. It can be found in personal care products, toys, kitchenware and clothing to reduce or prevent contamination and growth of bacteria. Although triclosan has been proven to fight bacteria and germs, adverse effects have been documented through its use – allergies, endocrine disruptions and toxicity, to name a few.

For the study the research team compared two types of soap through in vitro and in-vivo experiments. The two soaps were exposed to 20 different bacterial strains and tested under conditions which replicated hand washing.

Both products contained the same ingredients with the exception of one containing 0.3 percent triclosan. Microbe exposure lasted for 20 seconds and water temperatures were 22 and 40 degrees Celsius which are recommended temperatures for soap.

In-vitro testing was conducted at 22 degrees Celsius, and in-vivo testing was completed at 40 degrees Celsius by volunteers. Volunteers washed their hands in accordance to guidelines set out by the World Health Organization – lather soap vigorously for 30 seconds, cover entire surface of hands and lower forearms and rinse.

Researchers found there was no immediate significant difference in bacterial activity between the plain soap and the antibacterial soap which contained triclosan. After nine hours the antibacterial soap did show greater bactericidal effects which suggest the antibacterial effects of triclosan do not occur during hand washing but appear much later.

Researchers have two reasons as to why the triclosan soap didn’t kill the bacteria more immediately or more effectively than plain soap:

1) Exposure was too short – 20 seconds is not long enough to fight germs.

2) The soaps contained detergents and surfactants which could reduce the effectiveness of triclosan.

The findings were published in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.


Source:

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles

Advertisement

On any matter relating to your health or well-being, please check with an appropriate health professional. No statement herein is to be construed as a diagnosis, treatment, preventative, or cure for any disease, disorder or abnormal physical state. The statements herein have not been evaluated by the Foods and Drugs Administration or Health Canada. Dr. Marchione and the doctors on the Bel Marra Health Editorial Team are compensated by Bel Marra Health for their work in creating content, consulting along with formulating and endorsing products.

Exit mobile version