Lack of evidence to support depression treatment apps actually work

By: Emily Lunardo | Health News | Tuesday, October 13, 2015 - 11:00 AM

Lack of evidence to support depression treatment apps actually workEighty-five percent of depression treatment apps that are currently accredited by the National Health Services (NHS) have been found to lack evidence of their effectiveness. This is problematic because a stamp of approval from NHS may increase patients’ reliance on them as a form of treatment but, unfortunately, many of them fall short.

Researchers feel that until effectiveness can be fully evaluated, these apps should no longer be made available.

Mental health patients may opt to use apps as a means of self-treatment due to extensive wait times to seek professional care. It is reported that one in 10 mental health patients in the UK wait over a year for treatment and two out of every three patients wait for over three months. One in six patients waiting for treatment will attempt suicide and four in 10 will engage in self-harm.

There is a surge in popularity for the online and app-based programs to treat depression. In 2013 there were only 32 published articles discussing apps for depression, even though over 1500 apps were available for download. The authors of the study also found the same results for other mental health conditions, including bipolar, bulimia and post-traumatic stress disorder.

From the current evaluation the authors noted there were 27 mental health apps available by NHS, but only four were backed up by any scientific evidence. The authors wrote, “As such, confidence in, and the validity of, the claims made by apps that fail to apply such metrics must be considered as low at best, suggesting that the true clinical value of over 85 percent of NHS accredited mental health apps is at present impossible to determine.”

The authors warned, “Given that three in 10 individuals with an untreated mental health issue now opt to pay for private treatment on account of limited NHS availability, the purchase and use of apps that are yet to demonstrate objective clinical benefit is not only a potential waste of money, but also likely to have compounding effect on levels of anxiety in those with the greatest need and least access to effective treatment. In order to ensure that apps don’t do more harm than good, it is important that those presently recommended by the NHS apps library that either fail to demonstrate the evidence underlying the methodological approach taken, or evidence of effectiveness in use, are removed.”

The findings were published in the journal Evidence Based Mental Health.


Popular Stories

Cart Items